Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 2100M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps

NVIDIA NVS 2100M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 2100M and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 2100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (11W vs 31W)
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1575MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 2100M
0.039 TFLOPS
GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps +7135%
2.822 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Aug 2020
NVS Mobile
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1395 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1575 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
14
16
Shading Units
896
8
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.140 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.40 GPixel/s
4.280 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
88.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.645 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.822 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
88.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

11W
TDP
31W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
TU117
-
GPU Variant
N18S-G5
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy