Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 300 vs NVIDIA A2

NVIDIA NVS 300 vs NVIDIA A2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 16GB VRAM A2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 60W)
NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.1GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
1264 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
A2 +11517%
4.531 TFLOPS
VS
A2

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Nov 2021
NVS
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
200.1GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
10
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
1280
8
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.64 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
70.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.531 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.531 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
70.80 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
GA107
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
Unknown
57 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

18W
TDP
60W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy