Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD FirePro D300

NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD FirePro D300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (162.6GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
1264 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
FirePro D300 +5479%
2.176 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Jan 2014
NVS
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
162.6GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
20
16
Shading Units
1280
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.176 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
136.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Pitcairn
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

18W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy