Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 300 vs ATI FirePro V5800

NVIDIA NVS 300 vs ATI FirePro V5800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V5800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Lower TDP (18W vs 74W)
ATI FirePro V5800 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
784 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
FirePro V5800 +2730%
1.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Apr 2010
NVS
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
10
16
Shading Units
800
8
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.04 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
27.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1104 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Juniper
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
Juniper XT GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
1.04 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
166 mm²

Board Design

18W
TDP
74W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy