Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD FireStream 9350

NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD FireStream 9350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Lower TDP (18W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
1424 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350 +5069%
2.016 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Jun 2010
NVS
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
18
16
Shading Units
1440
8
TMUs
72
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Cypress
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Board Design

18W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy