Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD FireStream 9370

NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD FireStream 9370

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Lower TDP (18W vs 225W)
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
1584 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
FireStream 9370 +6669%
2.64 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Jun 2010
NVS
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
1600
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

18W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Cypress
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy