Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 300 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450

NVIDIA NVS 300 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
16 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (18W vs 83W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Jul 2005
NVS
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
-
8
TMUs
12
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
-
-
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-

Board Design

18W
TDP
83W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
NV41
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
130 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy