Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7500

NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7500

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 70W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7500 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
1776 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7500 +31156%
12.19 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Aug 2023
NVS
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1344 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
172.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
1792
8
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
28
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.8 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
190.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.37 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.19 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
380.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

18W
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Navi 33
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
Navi 33
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
13.3 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
204 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy