Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
624 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200 +4151%
1.658 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Jul 2019
NVS
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
640
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.72 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.658 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.658 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
103.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

18W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Polaris 23
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy