CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD Radeon RX 560 896SP
NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD Radeon RX 560 896SP
VS
NVIDIA NVS 300
AMD Radeon RX 560 896SP
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 560 896SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 45W)
AMD Radeon RX 560 896SP 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1175MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 560 896SP
+5300%
2.106 TFLOPS
NVS 300
VS
Radeon RX 560 896SP
Graphics Card
Jan 2011
Release Date
Jul 2017
NVS
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1090 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1175 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
14
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
896
8
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
18.80 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
65.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.106 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.106 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
131.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
18W
TDP
45W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
Polaris 21
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
Polaris 21 XL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
3 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD FireStream 9370
2
NVIDIA NVS 300 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB GA104
3
NVIDIA NVS 300 vs ATI Radeon HD 5570 OEM
4
NVIDIA NVS 300 vs ATI Radeon HD 3550
5
NVIDIA NVS 300 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra
6
NVIDIA NVS 300 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
7
NVIDIA NVS 300 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450
8
NVIDIA NVS 300 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2
9
NVIDIA NVS 300 vs ATI Radeon HD 5770 Mac Edition
10
NVIDIA NVS 300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
Related News
1
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
2
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
3
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
4
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
5
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
6
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
7
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
8
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
9
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
10
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy