Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 310 vs Intel Arc A350

NVIDIA NVS 310 vs Intel Arc A350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 310 and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 25W)
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
720 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
Arc A350 +2972%
3.072 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2022
NVS
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
875 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
25W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
DG2-128
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy