Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 310 vs ATI FireMV 2250

NVIDIA NVS 310 vs ATI FireMV 2250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 310 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 32W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2007
NVS
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
875 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
-
8
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

20W
TDP
32W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
RV516
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy