Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 310 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB

NVIDIA NVS 310 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 310 and 6GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
1744 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB +3305%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Mar 2014
NVS
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
875 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
1792
8
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
375W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
Tahiti
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
Orthrus
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy