Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 310 vs ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP

NVIDIA NVS 310 vs ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 310 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X800 GTO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
48 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 49W)
ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (31.36GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Nov 2007
NVS
Generation
Radeon R400 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
875 MHz
Memory Clock
490 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
31.36GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
48
Shading Units
-
8
TMUs
12
4
ROPs
12
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
R420
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
R420 GTO
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
R400
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
130 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
0.16 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
281 mm²

Board Design

20W
TDP
49W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x Molex

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0b (9_2)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy