Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

NVIDIA NVS 310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 310 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Lower TDP (20W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
168 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 +436%
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Sep 2008
NVS
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
875 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
448bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
27
48
Shading Units
216
8
TMUs
72
4
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
182W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
GT200
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy