Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 310 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX

NVIDIA NVS 310 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 310 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 XTX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 240W)
ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (106.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
272 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2900 XTX +376%
0.476 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Unknown
NVS
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
875 MHz
Memory Clock
828 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
106.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
320
8
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.89 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.89 GTexel/s
-
-
-
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
475.5 GFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

20W
TDP
240W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
R600
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
R600 XTX A11 (215RGMDKA11FG)
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy