Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 310 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

NVIDIA NVS 310 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 310 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
1744 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 285 +3190%
3.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Sep 2014
NVS
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
875 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
1792
8
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.38 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.290 TFLOPS
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.290 TFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
205.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
190W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
Tonga
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
5 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy