Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 315 vs AMD FirePro V5900

NVIDIA NVS 315 vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 315 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Lower TDP (19W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
464 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 315
0.1 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900 +514%
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
May 2011
NVS
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
875 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
8
48
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
Cayman
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Board Design

19W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy