CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA NVS 315 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition
NVIDIA NVS 315 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition
VS
NVIDIA NVS 315
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA NVS 315 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 195W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Boost Clock1058MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
1488 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
NVS 315
0.1 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition
+3150%
3.25 TFLOPS
NVS 315
VS
GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Apr 2013
NVS
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1006 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1058 MHz
875 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
1
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
48
Shading Units
1536
8
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.86 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
135.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.250 TFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.4 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GF119
GPU Name
GK104
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
GK104-400-A2
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Board Design
19W
TDP
195W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.1
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA NVS 315 vs AMD Radeon HD 6350
2
NVIDIA NVS 315 vs ATI FireGL V7700
3
NVIDIA NVS 315 vs ATI FirePro V5700
4
NVIDIA NVS 315 vs AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM
5
NVIDIA NVS 315 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
6
NVIDIA NVS 315 vs AMD Radeon RX 6600
7
NVIDIA NVS 315 vs AMD Radeon HD 6770
8
NVIDIA NVS 315 vs AMD Radeon R7 240
9
NVIDIA NVS 315 vs ATI FirePro V7760
10
NVIDIA NVS 315 vs AMD Radeon RX 480
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy