Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 315 vs ATI Radeon HD 4890

NVIDIA NVS 315 vs ATI Radeon HD 4890

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 4890 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 315 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Lower TDP (19W vs 190W)
ATI Radeon HD 4890 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.8GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 315
0.1 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4890 +1260%
1.36 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Apr 2009
NVS
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
875 MHz
Memory Clock
975 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
124.8GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
10
48
Shading Units
800
8
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.60 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1360 GFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
272.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
RV790
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
RV790 XT (215-0758016)
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
0.959 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
282 mm²

Board Design

19W
TDP
190W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy