Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 4200M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

NVIDIA NVS 4200M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM NVS 4200M and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock1038MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
336 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (10W vs 25W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 4200M
0.156 TFLOPS
GeForce MX250 +410%
0.797 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Unknown
NVS Mobile
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
937 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
3
48
Shading Units
384
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.620 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.61 GPixel/s
6.480 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.91 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.46 GFLOPS
155.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
797.2 GFLOPS
12.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.91 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
GP108B
N12P-NS1-S-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy