Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 4200M vs AMD Radeon E9550 MXM

NVIDIA NVS 4200M vs AMD Radeon E9550 MXM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM NVS 4200M and 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 4200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 95W)
AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1266MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 4200M
0.156 TFLOPS
Radeon E9550 MXM +3639%
5.834 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Sep 2016
NVS Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1120 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1266 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
36
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
2304
8
TMUs
144
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.620 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.51 GPixel/s
6.480 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
182.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.834 TFLOPS
155.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.834 TFLOPS
12.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
364.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
Ellesmere
N12P-NS1-S-A1
GPU Variant
Ellesmere XT
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy