Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 510 vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

NVIDIA NVS 510 vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM NVS 510 and 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 185W)
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 510
0.306 TFLOPS
CMP 40HX +2384%
7.603 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2012
Release Date
Feb 2021
NVS
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1470 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
36
192
Shading Units
2304
16
TMUs
144
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.188 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
12.75 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
237.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.21 TFLOPS
306.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.603 TFLOPS
12.75 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
237.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
185W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
TU106
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
TU106-100-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy