Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 510 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT X2

NVIDIA NVS 510 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM NVS 510 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.51GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
72 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 510 +59%
0.306 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2600 XT X2
0.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2012
Release Date
Jul 2007
NVS
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
120
16
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.188 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
12.75 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
306.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
12.75 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
RV630
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy