Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P102 100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA P102 100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 5GB VRAM P102 100 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P102 100 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1683MHz vs 1665MHz)
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (440.3GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P102 100 +260%
10.77 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Apr 2019
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1582 MHz
Base Clock
1485 MHz
1683 MHz
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
1376 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
440.3GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

25
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
3200
Shading Units
896
200
TMUs
56
80
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
0 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

134.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
53.28 GPixel/s
336.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.24 GTexel/s
168.3 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.967 TFLOPS
10.77 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.984 TFLOPS
336.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
93.24 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
TU117
GP102-100-A1
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
12 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy