Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P102 101 vs ATI FirePro V3800

NVIDIA P102 101 vs ATI FirePro V3800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 10GB VRAM P102 101 and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P102 101 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1670MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.3GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2800 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P102 101 +1955%
10.69 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2018
Release Date
Apr 2010
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1557 MHz
Base Clock
-
1670 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

10GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.3GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
25
SM Count
-
3200
Shading Units
400
200
TMUs
20
80
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
0 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

133.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
334.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
167.0 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
334.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
43W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
Redwood
GP102-101-A1
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy