Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P102 101 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

NVIDIA P102 101 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 10GB VRAM P102 101 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P102 101 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1670MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.3GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Lower TDP (190W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P102 101 +224%
10.69 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 285
3.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2018
Release Date
Sep 2014
Mining GPUs
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1557 MHz
Base Clock
-
1670 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

10GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.3GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
25
SM Count
-
3200
Shading Units
1792
200
TMUs
112
80
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
0 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

133.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.38 GPixel/s
334.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.8 GTexel/s
167.0 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.290 TFLOPS
10.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.290 TFLOPS
334.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
205.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
190W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
Tonga
GP102-101-A1
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
5 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy