Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P106 090 vs AMD FirePro W7000

NVIDIA P106 090 vs AMD FirePro W7000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM P106 090 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P106 090 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.2GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro W7000 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P106 090
2.352 TFLOPS
FirePro W7000 +3%
2.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2017
Release Date
Jun 2012
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1354 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.2GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
1280
48
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

73.49 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
73.49 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.00 GTexel/s
36.74 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.352 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.432 TFLOPS
73.49 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
152.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
Pitcairn
GP106-090-A1
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy