Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P106 090 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

NVIDIA P106 090 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM P106 090 and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P106 090 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 26% (1531MHz vs 1219MHz)
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.2GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P106 090 +88%
2.352 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 2100
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2017
Release Date
Jun 2017
Mining GPUs
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1354 MHz
Base Clock
925 MHz
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.2GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s

Render Config

6
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
8
768
Shading Units
512
48
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

73.49 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
73.49 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
36.74 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
2.352 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
73.49 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
Lexa
GP106-090-A1
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO GL
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
16 nm
Process Size
14 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy