Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 232 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

NVIDIA PG506 232 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3368 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 171W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 232 +1825%
10.32 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Nov 2008
Tesla
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
896MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
3072bit
Memory Bus
448bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
27
3584
Shading Units
216
224
TMUs
72
96
ROPs
28
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
24 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
171W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.3
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy