CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA PG506 232 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
NVIDIA PG506 232 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
VS
NVIDIA PG506 232
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
PG506 232
+80%
10.32 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
5.728 TFLOPS
PG506 232
VS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Apr 2017
Tesla
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
3072bit
Memory Bus
256bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
56
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
36
3584
Shading Units
2304
224
TMUs
144
96
ROPs
32
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
24 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
Ellesmere
-
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
7 nm
Process Size
14 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Board Design
165W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (12_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA PG506 232 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition
2
NVIDIA PG506 232 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
3
NVIDIA PG506 232 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2
4
NVIDIA PG506 232 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7500
5
NVIDIA PG506 232 vs AMD Radeon Pro V340
6
NVIDIA PG506 232 vs NVIDIA T1000
7
NVIDIA PG506 232 vs NVIDIA P102 100
8
NVIDIA PG506 232 vs AMD FirePro V5900
9
NVIDIA PG506 232 vs AMD Radeon HD 6490
10
NVIDIA PG506 232 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy