Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 232 vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

NVIDIA PG506 232 vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 56% (1440MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 232 +444%
10.32 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 270 1024SP
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Mar 2015
Tesla
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
3072bit
Memory Bus
256bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
1024
224
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
32
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
24 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Pitcairn
-
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy