Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 232 vs AMD Radeon R9 290

NVIDIA PG506 232 vs AMD Radeon R9 290

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 232 +112%
10.32 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290
4.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Nov 2013
Tesla
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
3072bit
Memory Bus
512bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
40
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
2560
224
TMUs
160
96
ROPs
64
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
24 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
60.61 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
151.5 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.849 TFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
606.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
275W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Hawaii
-
GPU Variant
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy