Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 242 vs AMD FireStream 9250

NVIDIA PG506 242 vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 242 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
2784 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 242 +932%
10.32 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2008
Tesla
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
3072bit
Memory Bus
256bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
800
224
TMUs
40
96
ROPs
16
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
24 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy