Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 242 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI

NVIDIA PG506 242 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 242 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 4000 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
Released 17 years late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 165W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Apr 2004
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Rankine
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
3072bit
Memory Bus
256bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
-
224
TMUs
12
96
ROPs
8
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
24 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

165W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x SDI
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
NV41
-
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
Ampere
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
130 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
N/A
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy