CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
VS
NVIDIA Quadro 2000
Intel Arctic Sound M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
8000 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
+2972%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000
VS
Intel Arctic Sound M
Graphics Card
Dec 2010
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
8192
32
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS
Board Design
62W
TDP
500W
250 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GF106
GPU Name
DG2-512
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB
2
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16
3
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000
4
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
5
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40d
6
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X
7
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 7000
8
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI6
9
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA L40S
10
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
Related News
1
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
2
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
3
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
4
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
5
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
6
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
7
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
8
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
9
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
10
World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy