Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 4700 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (62W vs 226W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000 +25%
0.48 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4700 X2
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Apr 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
192
Shading Units
128
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
G92
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
G92-880-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Board Design

62W
TDP
226W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy