Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 108W)
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock784MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200 +338%
2.107 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
771 MHz
-
Boost Clock
784 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
1344
32
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
-
-
-
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS

Board Design

62W
TDP
108W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
GK104
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.1
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy