Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 110W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
2880 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000D
0.48 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh +1877%
9.492 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2011
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1035 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
48
192
Shading Units
3072
32
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.98 TFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.492 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
296.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

62W
TDP
110W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
TU104B
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy