Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (41.60GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 62W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000D +921%
0.48 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380M
0.047 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2011
Release Date
Jan 2010
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
2
192
Shading Units
16
32
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.424 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.848 GTexel/s
-
-
-
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
46.98 GFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

62W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
GT218
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
N10M-GLM
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy