Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Lower TDP (62W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000D +3%
0.48 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2011
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
24
192
Shading Units
192
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

62W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
GT200B
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy