Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 32 GB

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 32 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D and 32GB VRAM Tesla V100 DGXS 32 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 32 GB 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (897.0GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
4928 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000D
0.48 TFLOPS
Tesla V100 DGXS 32 GB +3164%
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2011
Release Date
Mar 2018
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1297 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
876 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
897.0GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
80
-
Compute Units
-
192
Shading Units
5120
32
TMUs
320
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
GV100
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Board Design

62W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
7.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy