Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1687MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile +1699%
8.637 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000D
0.48 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Oct 2011
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1215 MHz
Base Clock
-
1687 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
4
2560
Shading Units
192
80
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

80.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
135.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
8.637 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.637 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
135.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
62W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.1
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net