Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
144 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (51W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000 +69%
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
625 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
5
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
384
40
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
51W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
GK107
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.1
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy