Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (64GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
6416 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI210 +5138%
22.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Dec 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
625 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
64GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1638GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
104
5
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
6656
40
TMUs
416
32
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
181.0 TFLOPS
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.63 TFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.63 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
Aldebaran
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Fermi
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy