Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 600W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
13840 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI300 +10981%
47.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
625 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
220
5
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
14080
40
TMUs
880
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
880
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
600W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
153 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy