Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 80W)
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1260MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
7184 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
RTX A5500 Max Q +4231%
18.71 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
585 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1260 MHz
625 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
5
SM Count
58
240
Shading Units
7424
40
TMUs
232
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
232
-
RT Cores
58
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
121.0 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
292.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.71 TFLOPS
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
18.71 TFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
292.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
GA103
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
22 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
496 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy