Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
8144 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M +13557%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
770 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

6
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
48
Shading Units
8192
16
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
8 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

32W
TDP
500W
200 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy