Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 24GB VRAM Quadro M6000 24 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1114MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
3024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Quadro M6000 24 GB +6237%
6.844 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Mar 2016
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
988 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1114 MHz
770 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
317.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
3072
16
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
106.9 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
285.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.844 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
213.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
GM200
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
GM200-880-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
8 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
601 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
5.2
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy