Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350

NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 96GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 450W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (96GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (2458GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
14288 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1350 +41048%
44.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
750 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
770 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
96GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
2458GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
14336
16
TMUs
896
8
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
896
-
RT Cores
112
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1389 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.44 TFLOPS
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.44 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
44.44 TFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
450W
200 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
100 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy